Biciid Center
AI Model Governance Policy
Effective Date: February 2026
Purpose
This AI Model Governance Policy establishes the framework for the development, deployment, monitoring, and oversight of artificial intelligence systems operated or integrated by Biciid Center, including Tiraab AI.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure:
- Ethical AI deployment
- Cultural integrity protection
- Responsible innovation
- Transparency and accountability
- Safety and legal compliance
AI systems must serve heritage, scholarship, and community well-being.
Scope
This policy applies to:
- Tiraab AI and related language systems
- AI-assisted moderation tools
- AI-driven recommendation systems
- AI-powered analytics
- AI used in games or educational modules
- Third-party AI integrations
It applies to internal staff, contractors, technical partners, and system administrators.
Governance Structure
AI governance at Biciid Center operates under:
- Human Oversight — All AI systems remain under human control and review.
- Executive Responsibility — Leadership is accountable for ethical deployment and policy compliance.
- Technical Oversight — Designated technical administrators manage system implementation and safeguards.
- Moderation Integration — AI outputs are subject to moderation standards.
- Ethical Review — Sensitive AI updates may require internal review prior to deployment.
AI Lifecycle Management
AI systems must follow structured lifecycle management:
Design Phase
Define purpose & scope · Risk assessment · Cultural sensitivity review
Development Phase
Bias testing · Safety filters · Document model parameters
Deployment Phase
Monitor performance · Enable logging · Implement safeguards
Post-Deployment
Continuous monitoring · Periodic review · Safety updates · Documentation
No AI system may be deployed without documented approval.
Risk Classification Framework
Low Risk
Language formatting assistance · Non-sensitive analytics
Moderate Risk
Content summarization · Educational assistance
High Risk
Cultural interpretation · Historical narrative generation · Moderation automation
Critical Risk
Systems influencing access, ranking, or enforcement · AI interacting with youth or vulnerable users
Higher risk systems require stricter oversight and testing.
Cultural Integrity Safeguards
AI must not:
- Fabricate archaeological evidence
- Distort clan or community history
- Misrepresent religious teachings
- Promote divisive narratives
Sensitive heritage topics must include clear disclaimers when uncertain and encouragement of scholarly verification.
Cultural distortion is considered a serious governance breach.
Bias Monitoring
AI systems must be monitored for:
- Clan bias
- Gender bias
- Religious bias
- Political bias
- Linguistic distortion
Regular bias audits should be conducted. Corrective updates must be documented.
Data Governance
AI training and operational data must:
- Respect privacy standards
- Avoid unauthorized personal data usage
- Avoid misuse of community knowledge
- Comply with applicable laws
Sensitive cultural data must be protected. Data used for model improvement must be documented and secured.
Transparency Requirements
Biciid Center commits to:
- Informing users when interacting with AI
- Providing AI limitations disclosures
- Explaining content restrictions clearly
Major AI updates affecting behavior must be internally documented.
Security Controls
AI systems must include:
- Access controls
- Logging mechanisms
- Abuse detection systems
- Rate limiting
Unauthorized access to AI systems is strictly prohibited.
Incident Response
If AI misuse or malfunction occurs:
- The incident must be logged
- Immediate review must occur
- Harmful outputs must be mitigated
- Safeguards must be updated
Severe incidents may require temporary system suspension or public clarification if necessary.
Vendor & Third-Party Compliance
When using third-party AI services:
- Contracts must include data protection clauses
- Ethical alignment must be reviewed
- Cultural protection standards must be upheld
No vendor may access cultural data without documented agreement.
Continuous Improvement
AI systems must undergo:
- Periodic performance review
- Cultural consultation where appropriate
- Technical upgrades
- Safety recalibration
Governance policies must evolve with technological changes.
Accountability & Enforcement
Failure to comply with this policy may result in:
- System suspension
- Contract termination (for partners)
- Internal disciplinary review
- Platform access restrictions
Governance violations involving cultural harm are considered serious breaches.
Review & Amendment
This policy will be reviewed periodically to reflect:
- Technological developments
- Legal requirements
- Cultural considerations
- Community feedback
Updates require documented approval.
Closing Statement
Artificial intelligence at Biciid Center must serve culture, not override it.
Innovation must align with dignity.
Automation must remain accountable.
Technology must protect heritage, not compromise it.
Human oversight remains central to all AI systems.
© 2026 Biciid Center for Culture & Nature. All rights reserved.