Skip to main content
    Back to Policies

    Biciid Center

    AI Model Governance Policy

    Effective Date: February 2026

    Purpose

    This AI Model Governance Policy establishes the framework for the development, deployment, monitoring, and oversight of artificial intelligence systems operated or integrated by Biciid Center, including Tiraab AI.

    The purpose of this policy is to ensure:

    • Ethical AI deployment
    • Cultural integrity protection
    • Responsible innovation
    • Transparency and accountability
    • Safety and legal compliance

    AI systems must serve heritage, scholarship, and community well-being.

    Scope

    This policy applies to:

    • Tiraab AI and related language systems
    • AI-assisted moderation tools
    • AI-driven recommendation systems
    • AI-powered analytics
    • AI used in games or educational modules
    • Third-party AI integrations

    It applies to internal staff, contractors, technical partners, and system administrators.

    Governance Structure

    AI governance at Biciid Center operates under:

    • Human Oversight — All AI systems remain under human control and review.
    • Executive Responsibility — Leadership is accountable for ethical deployment and policy compliance.
    • Technical Oversight — Designated technical administrators manage system implementation and safeguards.
    • Moderation Integration — AI outputs are subject to moderation standards.
    • Ethical Review — Sensitive AI updates may require internal review prior to deployment.

    AI Lifecycle Management

    AI systems must follow structured lifecycle management:

    Design Phase

    Define purpose & scope · Risk assessment · Cultural sensitivity review

    Development Phase

    Bias testing · Safety filters · Document model parameters

    Deployment Phase

    Monitor performance · Enable logging · Implement safeguards

    Post-Deployment

    Continuous monitoring · Periodic review · Safety updates · Documentation

    No AI system may be deployed without documented approval.

    Risk Classification Framework

    Low Risk

    Language formatting assistance · Non-sensitive analytics

    Moderate Risk

    Content summarization · Educational assistance

    High Risk

    Cultural interpretation · Historical narrative generation · Moderation automation

    Critical Risk

    Systems influencing access, ranking, or enforcement · AI interacting with youth or vulnerable users

    Higher risk systems require stricter oversight and testing.

    Cultural Integrity Safeguards

    AI must not:

    • Fabricate archaeological evidence
    • Distort clan or community history
    • Misrepresent religious teachings
    • Promote divisive narratives

    Sensitive heritage topics must include clear disclaimers when uncertain and encouragement of scholarly verification.

    Cultural distortion is considered a serious governance breach.

    Bias Monitoring

    AI systems must be monitored for:

    • Clan bias
    • Gender bias
    • Religious bias
    • Political bias
    • Linguistic distortion

    Regular bias audits should be conducted. Corrective updates must be documented.

    Data Governance

    AI training and operational data must:

    • Respect privacy standards
    • Avoid unauthorized personal data usage
    • Avoid misuse of community knowledge
    • Comply with applicable laws

    Sensitive cultural data must be protected. Data used for model improvement must be documented and secured.

    Transparency Requirements

    Biciid Center commits to:

    • Informing users when interacting with AI
    • Providing AI limitations disclosures
    • Explaining content restrictions clearly

    Major AI updates affecting behavior must be internally documented.

    Security Controls

    AI systems must include:

    • Access controls
    • Logging mechanisms
    • Abuse detection systems
    • Rate limiting

    Unauthorized access to AI systems is strictly prohibited.

    Incident Response

    If AI misuse or malfunction occurs:

    • The incident must be logged
    • Immediate review must occur
    • Harmful outputs must be mitigated
    • Safeguards must be updated

    Severe incidents may require temporary system suspension or public clarification if necessary.

    Vendor & Third-Party Compliance

    When using third-party AI services:

    • Contracts must include data protection clauses
    • Ethical alignment must be reviewed
    • Cultural protection standards must be upheld

    No vendor may access cultural data without documented agreement.

    Continuous Improvement

    AI systems must undergo:

    • Periodic performance review
    • Cultural consultation where appropriate
    • Technical upgrades
    • Safety recalibration

    Governance policies must evolve with technological changes.

    Accountability & Enforcement

    Failure to comply with this policy may result in:

    • System suspension
    • Contract termination (for partners)
    • Internal disciplinary review
    • Platform access restrictions

    Governance violations involving cultural harm are considered serious breaches.

    Review & Amendment

    This policy will be reviewed periodically to reflect:

    • Technological developments
    • Legal requirements
    • Cultural considerations
    • Community feedback

    Updates require documented approval.

    Closing Statement

    Artificial intelligence at Biciid Center must serve culture, not override it.

    Innovation must align with dignity.

    Automation must remain accountable.

    Technology must protect heritage, not compromise it.

    Human oversight remains central to all AI systems.

    © 2026 Biciid Center for Culture & Nature. All rights reserved.

    We use cookies for essential functionality. Privacy Policy